🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust evidence".

Earlier, support built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to copy this path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

Even as this global debate continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that states globally are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.